Rsat tools with wine for mac9/5/2023 ![]() Terminal programs and scripts are easy and fast to write, easy to interact with, easy to change, and trivially portable across POSIX platforms hence, when writing a tool for oneself or another developer, most developers will usually opt for a CLI-based UI. They may seem that way to some, but they still provide a surprisingly versatile and useful user interface. ![]() Getting from artifice to industry is important at some point.Įdit: go check out the mcollective demos to get an idea of how you can change the access/use model. I have lots of teams, more ICs, and many hosts. That said, we may be trying to solve different problems. If you need to do adhoc exploratory stuff on prod thats a good sign you lack control or valid synoptic model of your systems. But the output of dev should be discrete managed artifacts. The environment can certainly look or feel the same. #3 again a transport problem, or similar.įor your last point my issue is if you treat dev and prod as similar change and access problems. For #1 & #2 Its that you have structure, repeatability, validation, auditing, testability, etc. Its also inportant that theres an intermediary so you can get the scope of control away relying on client and end hosts.įor #1 interactive is almost orthoganal. Its more important that your actions are discrete, well modeled, with defined & structured inputs and outputs. It doesnt really matter that the transport or message model is. See MCollective or AWS SSM for examples Im familiar with. To answer your questions you probably have a dedicated on host agent. I have no real problem with the transport mechanism. Theyre different, but generally conflated. I tried to distinguish between SSH the multiplexed secure network channel provider and Secure Shell, the default and overwhelmingly popular use case of SSH. Personally, I've been trying to move app deployment and debugging onto SSH in every team I've worked with, and I will be very happy when developers are able to treat a remote machine (development or production) as little more than just a well-managed local machine. Forwarding network ports to provide secure access to remote services, e.g. Synchronising files on remote machines, via SFTP and Rsync ģ. Running commands on remote machines, interactively & non-interactively Ģ. ![]() > Moving to a well structered, repeatable, management paradigm is the only way to survive large or long term deployments.Īnd how would such a paradigm remotely access the machines? The tool I use uses SSH for:ġ. Hell, I've seen management via ansible devolve into a mess of unmaintainable, unrepeatable script heap. Ad-hoc management is just as possible and easy via RSAT and PowerShell. What people do with their remote access is not SSH's concern. > Managing your hosts via Secure Shell simply leads to bespoke, unrepeatable, outcomes and crushing debt. ![]() And in addition to not wasting processor and memory pushing pixels, Windows Servers without the GUI are susceptible to less attacks, require less changes during Windows updates, and reboot faster, all on account of just having "less" onboard. Most Windows admins still prefer a lot of GUI management (I've gotten some groans in response to my statement new servers would tend not to have it), but remote desktop to the server is no longer the preferred way to do that: Remote Server Administration Tools effectively installs all of the server GUI on your desktop PC.ĭue to the number of legacy applications Windows Server folks tend to support, it's unlikely server GUIs are going away entirely anytime soon, but for a lot of basic server functions supported directly by Microsoft, it's doable. An even thinner version of Windows Server, Nano Server, is also available, and includes even less GUI, being much more like a Linux terminal UI, though it is a bit less intuitive to get started with as you can't even install it, you have to image it to deploy. Starting with Server 2016, the default installation method of Windows Server no longer includes most of the GUI (called the Desktop Experience), leaving you with a command prompt window in the middle of the screen instead. Microsoft has come a really long way recently towards moving to CLI-based management. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply.AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |